As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more.

NETGEAR EX6120 WiFi Extender Review: Would Owners Buy It Again?

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. If you buy through links on this page we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. How this review was made: We did not test this extender in person. The verdict rests on three independent test write-ups listed at the end. Two of those tests date from 2018, and the Consumer Reports finding reaches us through a news summary because the original is behind a paywall. We say so where it matters. Our method.

Skip

Easy to set up, but independent tests found it slow

The EX6120 is tiny and quick to install, and it is inexpensive. The problem is speed. Tom's Guide measured about 25 Mbps in its mock home and called throughput poor. Top Ten Reviews found it kept only about 7 to 13 percent of the original network speed and ranked it near the bottom of ten extenders. A BGR summary of Consumer Reports ratings lists it among two extenders to avoid. Better options exist for little extra, so we say skip.

Check current price on Amazon → Prices and availability change often, so we don't list them here.

Buy it again if you…

  • only need to fill one small dead spot for basic browsing
  • care most about a tiny plug-in size
  • want the simplest possible setup

Skip it if you…

  • want fast speeds for 4K streaming or gaming in the far room
  • need to cover a large dead zone
  • want modern features such as beamforming or gigabit Ethernet

The NETGEAR EX6120 is a compact plug-in dual-band WiFi extender (AC1200 class). It repeats an existing router signal into a weak area and has a single Fast Ethernet port.

It is the model in the Amazon listing we checked. Most of the independent tests we found are several years old, so we note where evidence is dated, and we found no evidence that the hardware has since improved.

What owners say, at a glance

25 Mbpsmock-home throughput in Tom's Guide testTom's Guide, 2018
7 to 13%of original network speed keptTop Ten Reviews, 2018
90 ftrange measuredTom's Guide, 2018
Setup ease
Praised by reviewers
Size and design
Tiny, unobtrusive
Throughput
Weak in three sources
Feature set
No beamforming or MU-MIMO
Value versus alternatives
Better models recommended

Bars show our editorial summary of how consistently owners praise or complain about each area across all sources — not a lab measurement.

The key specs

TypePlug-in dual-band extender, AC1200 class
EthernetOne 100 Mbps port (not gigabit)
Beamforming / MU-MIMONot supported, per Tom's Guide
Measured rangeAbout 90 feet (Tom's Guide)
SupportOne-year warranty, 90 days of 24/7 support

What reviewers liked

Quick, easy setup.Tom's Guide's reviewer got it running in about nine minutes.
Small and unobtrusive.Both Tom's Guide and Top Ten Reviews praised the compact, discreet body.
Adequate for a small gap.On a porch about 50 feet away, Tom's Guide measured 43 Mbps, enough for 4K video and music.

What the tests found

Poor throughput.Tom's Guide measured 41 Mbps at its 50-foot test and about 25 Mbps in a mock home through a wall and up a floor, far below the stronger extenders in the same test.
Most of the speed is lost.Top Ten Reviews found it kept only about 7 to 13 percent of the original network speed, delivering 20 to 52 Mbps on networks of 200 to 530 Mbps, and placed it near the bottom of ten products.
Flagged by Consumer Reports.A BGR article summarising Consumer Reports ratings lists it as an extender to avoid, citing weak mid-range signal, barely usable far range, a poor versatility rating and a small number of supported devices.
Dated feature set.No beamforming or MU-MIMO, no USB port and a 100 Mbps Ethernet port.

Caveats

The two hands-on tests were published in 2018, so they reflect the router and device landscape of that time. They still describe the same model number sold today. We found no newer lab test that contradicts them. We also did not read the original Consumer Reports page, which is paywalled.

Tips if you already own one

  • Place it about halfway between the router and the dead spot, where the router signal is still strong.
  • Use it for basic browsing and video calls, not for demanding gaming.
  • For a whole-home fix, consider a mesh system instead of an extender.

Pros and cons

What owners love

  • Very small plug-in design
  • Quick setup (about nine minutes in one test)
  • Dual-band operation
  • Adequate for filling one small dead spot

What owners complain about

  • Weak throughput in three independent sources
  • Keeps only a fraction of the original speed in one test
  • No beamforming or MU-MIMO
  • Only a 100 Mbps Ethernet port

Other options to consider

Reviewers pointed to stronger extenders from TP-Link and NETGEAR for larger gaps.

ModelStyleConsider it if…
NETGEAR EX6120 (this review)Plug-in, AC1200You only need to patch one tiny dead spotSee on Amazon
TP-Link RE550Plug-in, AC1900You want a faster plug-in extender with a stronger signalSee on Amazon
TP-Link Deco X55 mesh
Read our review
Mesh systemYou want whole-home coverage rather than a spot fixSee on Amazon

Still want to look at the EX6120?

Compare it with the alternatives above, then check the current listing and reviews on Amazon.

See it on Amazon →

Frequently asked questions

Is the NETGEAR EX6120 any good?

It is easy to install and small, but Tom's Guide, Top Ten Reviews and a summary of Consumer Reports ratings all found its speeds weak.

Will it work for streaming?

In Tom's Guide's porch test it handled 4K video at 43 Mbps, but throughput dropped to about 25 Mbps in its mock home.

Is a mesh system better?

Consumer Reports notes that extenders roughly halve throughput on the extended network while mesh systems lose far less.

Are these tests current?

Two of the hands-on tests are from 2018. We found no newer test of this model that contradicts them.

Sources we analyzed

Figures reflect each source as of October 21, 2026 and may change. We summarize owner feedback in our own words and do not reproduce retailer reviews.